WebMar 23, 2024 · By ALYSSA MAE CLARINBulatlat.com. MANILA — A few weeks before the start of the trial, the National Telecommunications Commission (NTC) asked the Quezon … WebMar 23, 2024 · The alternative news group also said that the NTC’s statement that the judge was allegedly agreeing with Bulatlat’s lawyers – aside from being untrue – is hardly a ground for inhibition since Judge Bolante-Prado was only performing her regular duties.
§ 17.1-406. Appeals in criminal matters; cases over which Court of ...
WebGomez and Mateo, Jr. v. Villaluz, held that a judge may voluntarily inhibit himself on grounds other than those mentioned in paragraph 1, Section 1, Rule 137 and these grounds include bias and partiality. In Pimentel v. … WebThe matter of voluntary inhibition is primarily a matter of conscience and sound discretion on the part of the judge since he is in a better position to determine whether a given situation would unfairly affect his attitude towards the parties or their cases. folate free flour
To inhibit or not to inhibit The Manila Times
WebPetitioners maintain that Judge Magpale’s order of voluntary inhibition, issued on the ground of protecting the integrity of the judiciary, is null and void and should be set aside. They contend that the protection of the judiciary is not one of the grounds provided by law for voluntary inhibition of a judge. WebConsidering the spirit of the Rule, it would seem that cases of voluntary inhibition, based on good, sound and/or ethical grounds, is matter of discretion on the part of the judge … WebJudges; inhibition. The rule on compulsory disqualification and voluntary inhibition of judges is provided under Section 1, Rule 137 of the Rules of Court. While the second paragraph does not expressly enumerate the specific grounds for inhibition and leaves it to the sound discretion of the judge, such should be based on just or valid reasons. egg and bird cypress ca