Webb12 okt. 2024 · Peer review is essential for advancing scientific research, but there are long-standing concerns that authors' prestige or other characteristics can bias reviewers. Double-blind peer review has been proposed as a way to reduce reviewer bias, but the evidence for its effectiveness is limited and mixed. Webb13 maj 2015 · There were 4 RCTs testing the effects of revealing the peer reviewers’ identities (6, 14, 16, 17), and 1 study comparing a journal that uses single-blind peer review with one that reveals author and peer reviewer names, publishing the peer review report as part of the pre-publication history of articles accepted in the journal (9 – available in an …
What Is Peer Review? Types & Examples - Scribbr
Webb19 jan. 2024 · Reporting bias can skew the perceived risk–benefit ratio of treatments, ... (99/183) had posted results, and 92% (169/183) were published in a peer-reviewed journal . However, there is still work to be done. The same study found that 97% of post-FDAAA published trials (74/76) were published transparently compared to 84% ... WebbThe literature indicates the occurrence of bias in article reviews especially in the editor review due to the perception of the quality of the article (halo effect) due to the characteristics of the authors, especially the author’s name and affiliation (PETERS; CECI, 1982 PETERS, D. P.; CECI, S. J. Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate … smart and final long beach ca
Reducing bias in open-label trials where blinded outcome …
Webb27 maj 2016 · PHOTO: AAAS/ EPNAC.COM. Open in viewer. Deeply rooted assumptions creep into decision-making in unrecognized ways—even among the most well-intentioned peer-reviewers, journal editors, and science funders—and that can prevent the best science from being sponsored or published, experts said at a recent AAAS forum on implicit bias. Webb13 jan. 2024 · PeerJudge can help predict the overall reviewer decision and whether a paper will be ‘approved’, ‘approved with reservations’ or ‘not approved’. If further developed, the tool could be useful to notify reviewers that their peer review report and overall judgment are potentially inconsistent. It could help with journal reviewing ... WebbVarious types of bias and confounding have been described in the biomedical literature that can affect a study before, during, or after the intervention has been delivered. The … hill climb 2 youtube